Skip to comments.
Terrorist arrest shows holes in White House's Muslim outreach program; warnings ignored
centerforsecuritypolicy ^
| 2/24/2003
| centerforsecuritypolicy
Posted on 02/24/2003 8:06:59 AM PST by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-234 next last
To: Miss Marple
However, I would like to know why this is being aired instead of a private call to the White House. Does Gaffney not have any entre to the White House? Why not? Can he not pick up the phone and call someone like Cheney or Wolfowitz? They have warned them privately.
This is happening because Norquist publicly attacked Gaffney, playing the race card.
To: Chad Fairbanks
I a reckon we cain't go back tho'... Sure we could. Drop the moderators. Toss out the obvious statist agitprop posters, and relegate the wine and cheese crowd to their corner on picture threads.
To: DAnconia55
Sure we could. Drop the moderators. Toss out the obvious statist agitprop posters, and relegate the wine and cheese crowd to their corner on picture threads.What about the obvious non-statist agitprop posters?
183
posted on
02/24/2003 4:43:44 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
To: DAnconia55
Would suggest you forward your suggestions to the owner of this forum.
184
posted on
02/24/2003 4:45:49 PM PST
by
justshe
(Free Howlin!)
To: Chad Fairbanks
What about the obvious non-statist agitprop posters Ummm... perhaps you should familiarize yourself with the mission statement of FR.
To: justshe
Ah. Nothing to reply where I posted to you. But chiming in here.
Very good, then.
To: PhiKapMom
Didn't a thread like this get pulled earlier today? I was pinged to it, but by the time I clicked it had been pulled.
187
posted on
02/24/2003 4:46:48 PM PST
by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... (and please free howlin))
To: DAnconia55
Oh, I have... I have... but, agitprop is agitprop... I mean, why is one person's agitprop ok, but another's is not? Unlike Leftists, conservatives don't march in lockstep...
188
posted on
02/24/2003 4:49:12 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
To: DAnconia55
I think
another website already tried some of that...all of a sudden, they found they
needed bannings, suspensions, etc....
189
posted on
02/24/2003 4:53:38 PM PST
by
Amelia
(FREE HOWLIN!!)
To: Sabertooth
190
posted on
02/24/2003 4:54:04 PM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
To: Seeking the truth
Yes, and unfortunately, you apparently are unaware who is getting your great information relegated to the dustbin of the backroom!
Hence my reputation in this forum as a dewy-eyed naïf.
I was having a conversation about the information I was posting. You flamed the person with whom I was having a dialogue. She left this thread as a result. What, precisely, has your "awareness" accomplished?
To: Amelia
Let me see if I can be one of those so-called "Real Conservatives", ok? This is only a test...
"No living thing, could possibly survive in this Sargasso Sea choked with pretention, narcissism, self-absorption, fulsome back-slapping, mawkish self-congratlatoriness, arrogance, condescension, snobbery, hubris, elitism, self-righteousness, sanctimony, hypocrisy, sophistry, demagoguery, provincialism, phillistinism, reactionarism, anti-intellectualism, retrogressivism and pure hate.
The only way to bring this effluent-suffused, moribund biosphere back to life is the administration of copious quantities of (to use vcarducci's term) "consumerist propaganda", i.e. CAPITALISM and FREE ENTERPRISE, LIBERTARIANISM.
I've flipped through the posts here and quickly became overawed by the sheer volume of Statist-authoritarian collectivist-socialist-conformist-paternalist-totalitarian dogma, doggerel, rodomontade, agitprop and transparent propaganda. Such shopworn cliches, threadbare arguments, stale ideology, virtually every awkward, inapposite, solecistic word of it utterly vacuous. Post after post are nothing but mindless concatenations of empty epithets and turgid, non-cognitive rhetoric. For the defender of liberty, reason, rationality, truth, morality, dignity, enlightenment, culture, civilization, peace, progress and prosperity, this "forum" is positively GHASTLY destination in Cyberspace, an Auschwitz for the mind, heart and soul.
God, I feel MUCH better now... sort of cleansed my 'Statist Soul'... ;0)
192
posted on
02/24/2003 5:00:41 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
TLB wasn't happy with this one so he posted it again! I got pinged as well! Guess he figured he would go for a duplicate!
193
posted on
02/24/2003 5:02:01 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: PhiKapMom
I'm hoping he doesn't deliver triplets.
194
posted on
02/24/2003 5:07:54 PM PST
by
justshe
(Free Howlin!)
To: aristeides; Fred Mertz; tpaine; bvw; Seeking the truth; Sir Gawain
Ping to #192 - read it, then let me know if I can join your clique... I think I have all the words down and stuff...
195
posted on
02/24/2003 5:14:45 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
To: Sabertooth
Flame...LOL
Hey, I realize you are a relative newbie here but you have no idea what a "flame" is!
Reread my initial post to Miss Marple in reply #166.
The irony is that you still don't get it. I am on your side in this debate.
Miss Marple is not.
She leaves in a fit of pique after intimating that I am in league with some clique (I am not) and subscribe to another poster's calling her a "stay at home, soap opera soccer mom" (I do not)
You jump into something that doesn't concern you and start defending Miss Marple and go after me.
Miss Marple succeeded in cleaving two Freepers who agree with each other.
She rides off into the sunset after initiating the whole thing and you still defend her.
Incredible!
196
posted on
02/24/2003 5:17:55 PM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
To: Chad Fairbanks
You sure do like that agitprop, don't you?
197
posted on
02/24/2003 5:19:28 PM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
To: Seeking the truth
You sure do like that agitprop, don't you?Only yours, man... that 'statist' kind get's soggy in milk...
198
posted on
02/24/2003 5:21:03 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Chad,
What are you driving at?
What do you mean?
I think you are totally misreading me on this thread.
Gene McDonald
"Seeking the Truth"
PS...the agitprop line was meant as I joke as you have referred to it quite a bit in your last replies.
199
posted on
02/24/2003 5:27:38 PM PST
by
Seeking the truth
(I'm going on the FRN Cruise - How about you? - Details at www.Freerepublic.net)
To: Seeking the truth
PS...the agitprop line was meant as I joke as you have referred to it quite a bit in your last replies.I figured you would get a kick out of it ;0)
200
posted on
02/24/2003 5:30:16 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's quite frightening really)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-234 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson