Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill seeks to provide medical pot defense
Santa Cruz Sentinel ^ | February 20, 2003 | Brian Seals

Posted on 02/21/2003 8:04:16 AM PST by MrLeRoy

Medical marijuana users and growers in California could cite state law as a defense against federal prosecutors who criminalize their actions, under a bill planned by three federal lawmakers.

U.S. Reps. Sam Farr, D-Carmel, and Lynne Woolsey, D-Petaluma, plan to co-sponsor the bill next month with Rep. Dana Rohrbacher, an Orange County Republican.

The proposed legislation comes in the wake of stepped-up federal raids on medical marijuana gardens over the past year, including one at a Santa Cruz County cooperative last September.

The legislation also comes after marijuana guru Ed Rosenthal was convicted on federal charges of growing pot in Oakland in a trial during which his lawyers weren’t allowed to mention he was growing it for Oakland’s medical marijuana patients.

"The purpose of this bill is to allow defendants in federal criminal trials to introduce evidence that their marijuana-related activity was performed for a valid medical purpose under state law," Farr said in a written statement.

Farr is to be honored today in Sacramento during a press conference hosted by the marijuana advocacy group Americans for Safe Access. He was to be joined by family members of people recently convicted on federal marijuana charges.

Eight states have approved medical marijuana use, but the bill recognizing state marijuana law is likely to face an uphill battle in a Republican-controlled Congress.

Rohrbacher said the bill was a reasonable approach to settling the conflict between federal and state laws.

"As far as I know, it is the people of the state who are supposed to be determining criminal laws," he said by telephone Wednesday. "I just think that if the majority of people in a state vote to permit people to use marijuana for medical purposes, the federal government should not interfere with that."

The tension between federal enforcement and state laws was highlighted in Santa Cruz County during last September’s raid of the Wo/Men’s Alliance for Medical Marijuana’s Davenport garden.

About 167 plants were uprooted by federal drug agents, and co-founders Mike and Valerie Corral were briefly jailed. No charges have been filed.

Ben Rice, an attorney for the cooperative, said that while he wasn’t optimistic a federal measure would pass, he welcomed the proposed legislation.

"The WAMM and Rosenthal cases have really galvanized national attention to the problem we have here," Rice said. "I think this is a terrific move."

While the DEA hasn’t filed charges, WAMM has gone on the offensive, filing suit against the feds.

Having lost the first round of a court battle to get the marijuana back, the group is appealing the decision.

The group also plans to seek an injunction prohibiting similar raids in the future. The county and city have voted to join that suit as plaintiffs.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: drugskill; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 last
To: jmc813
You have in the past, however, stated that the reason you support the WOD is for the good of "society". I was trying to point out examples of when "society" is wrong.

If I leave Oklahoma headed for Florida and hit a roadjam, I am not going to turn around and go to California.

141 posted on 02/22/2003 10:19:18 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
In defense of LeRoy, who I have heartily flamed in the past, he posts the same warning to the pro-legalization crowd.

Huh?

142 posted on 02/22/2003 10:20:13 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
In defense of LeRoy, who I have heartily flamed in the past, he posts the same warning to the pro-legalization crowd.

Spoken like a gentleman, sir.

143 posted on 02/24/2003 6:11:23 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Spoken like a gentleman, sir.

Thank you. I became tired of the flaming on the Civil War threads and realized that it was wrong of me to flame on the WOD threads.

144 posted on 02/24/2003 5:30:09 PM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
What do they flame about on the Civil War threads?
145 posted on 02/25/2003 5:36:08 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
What do they flame about on the Civil War threads?

The Confederates were no different than Nazis, stuff like that. The thread will start off discussing for example, the battle between the Monitor and Merrimac, and it will quickly degenerate into "Lincoln was the anti-Christ and the southerners were all Nazis" type comments.

146 posted on 02/25/2003 7:04:50 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
Check out this one- watch how it degenerates:

Gods and Generals

147 posted on 02/25/2003 11:41:58 AM PST by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson