Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: TLBSHOW; hchutch
First, go read Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution. That defines treason. Gaffney accused them of engaging in acts falling within that definition.

Second:

Please answer the following question with a "yes" or "no" answer. Please note for the record that this is the THIRD time I have asked you for a "yes" or a "no" answer, and that you have refused to provide it.

Did Frank Gaffney actually present any evidence to support the allegations of treason he made against two White House staffers?

Again, please answer the above question with a "yes" or a "no" answer.
52 posted on 02/20/2003 7:35:48 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
I thought it was being denied on this thread that Gaffney alleged "treason." Are you saying that he did?

Even if he did use the word -- and I don't think even you have claimed that he did -- are you demanding that a non-lawyer use the word in the technical sense it has in U.S. (not, for example, UK) law?

54 posted on 02/20/2003 7:39:01 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson