I thought that guy was pretty credible.
I believe that was Haskell. He is the guy the folks who "know" DW is guilty really hate. He didn't show the psychotic DA enough respect.
Part 3 is about Haskell and how he made a fool of Dusek. Judge Mudd was really exposed as biased during Haskell's cross-exam as well.
I thought that guy was pretty credible.
Actually, everyone except for Rodriguez, was credible. The problem with the dates was a brand new temp. study that Dr. Gail Anderson published in 2000. It doubled the amount of thermal energy required for fly development. It needs some serious "Peer Review".