I am saying the article only contains PART of his testimony.
Going by media articles to determine Westerfield's guilt is like the JURY listening ONLY TO THE PROSECUTION's SIDE and totally ignoring the DEFENSE.
OH, WAIT A MINUTE, THAT'S WHAT THEY DID.
I am saying that Conklin's testimony is just like many of the other witnesses. He wavers on stating anything absolutely for the record.
He is brought in claiming he heard a voice in the Motorhome, and thinks it was Danielle.
His statement, when asked, is that He THINKS he REMEMBERS hearing WESTERFIELD say something, which he can't hear very well due to the sound of the ENGINE RUNNING on his truck (no muffler?)
He says he quits digging, going over to DW's side (where he is digging too), and asks him did he say something. He then says DW says SOMETHING KINDA LIKE "I didn't say anything" or "it wasn't me".
KINDA, MAYBE,SOMETHING LIKE, I THINK, all just the kind of testimony EVERYONE in the UNITED STATES should just accept as PERFECT ABSOLUTE PROOF OF GUILT.
Remember, he has been out there, had people parked right next to him, then moves later on, gets stuck, has someone come by, then this (I tow vehicles out of the sand when I'm not too drunk) tow driver helps pull him out of the sand and Prosecution tried to imply that Danielle was in the MH the whole time. That this guy might have, maybe, heard a voice over the sound of the engine, when no one else, in perfect absolute quiet of the night, etc. ever heard anything.
Do you believe he heard Danielle's voice?