A picture is worth a thousand words. Post #13 re-affirms the statement. Although I never saw that photo before, the photo is consistent with the pilot's stories.
The Mirror owns a printing press and buys its ink by the barrel. Unfortunately, those facts may give an illusion of credibility; but those facts alone do not make a left wing agenda driven publisher's information trustworthy.
Cheers.
A picture is worth a thousand words. Post #13 re-affirms the statement. Although I never saw that photo before, the photo is consistent with the pilot's stories.
The photo in post 13 appears to have been taken some time after the crash, as there is no fireball. It is also some distance from the crash site. Needless to say, it is also quite possible that the image has been doctored, as there does appear to be editing artifacts in the image. Enlarging the image without resampling should provide even pixalation, whereas this image indicates uneven pixalation with pronounced dropoffs, especially in the areas in the top left portion of the image proceeding from the cloud of smoke.
The Mirror owns a printing press and buys its ink by the barrel. Unfortunately, those facts may give an illusion of credibility; but those facts alone do not make a left wing agenda driven publisher's information trustworthy.
Whatever the agenda of the messenger, the facts remain the same. It is simply a matter of wanting to know the truth. Typical in these situations where the truth is not out in the open, there are those that resort to ad hominem arguments in order to challenge the credibility of the information presented. I doubt those eyewitnesses that actually saw the events unfold are leftists, and I doubt that they are trying to embarrass the administration. They are simply reporting what they saw.