Here's a big surprise.
1 posted on
01/02/2003 7:00:42 PM PST by
Jaded
To: MagnoliaMS; I. Ben Hurt; UCANSEE2; FresnoDA; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; MizSterious; skipjackcity; ...
Countdown Ping12 Hours and counting.
2 posted on
01/02/2003 7:03:51 PM PST by
Jaded
To: Jaded
Old news.
To: Jaded
Westerfield's attorneys made the van Dams' lifestyle an issue at trial, telling jurors that Danielle could have been slain by someone they met through "swinging" activities and that they drank alcohol and smoked marijuana on the night of the crime. Interesting.
Didn't Brenda testify that she "drank alcohol and smoked marijuana on the night of the crime"? And didn't Denise Kemal testify about the swinging?
So where's Dave Westerfields' liability in this ?
To: Jaded
Yeah, a huge surprise.
One motive might be, that the Van Dams don't want Westerfield to be in a position to "hire" detectives to give him some help, say a Mark Furman type.
sw
14 posted on
01/03/2003 5:03:18 AM PST by
spectre
To: Jaded
The VanDam's want a new house..Brenda said she has to drive past Westerfield's house going to hers, and it's upsetting to her...
17 posted on
01/04/2003 1:23:53 AM PST by
Bella
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson