Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: ArcLight; All
An interesting disconnect here...think about it.

In modern erotica (okay, PORN) most of the starlets (not that ANY FReeper men would EVER watch any such movies or videos...) are, in fact, quite curvy and voluptuous, even to the point of surgically enhancing those features. Remember, these women, more than perhaps any other, earn a living by being the objects of male sexual fantasies and desires. They would NOT seek to look like something men would find unnatractive.

Contrast this with the alleged "supermodels". Most fashion models are taller, thinner, and bonier than most porn actresses. Many do, in fact, resemble heroin addicts. A simple image search on Google revealed these contrasts, in graphic detail.

Point is, (with Playboy being the notable exception), modern men DO prefer the voluptuous look, at least if their preference in sexually stimulating imagery is any guide. Why MODELS, on the other hand, are skewed towards the "gaunt, waif" look probably DOES have more to do with the preference of the clothing designers they work for than previously thought.

BTW, a quick look at a few recent copies of Playboy (in the interest of science, of course) reveals that whilst their models have slimmed down some, few would ever be seen on a high-fashion runway even now.

Simply put, a woman with some curves looks HEALTHY and FERTILE, qualities which have for the breadth of human history have been sexual triggers for men. The supermodels, by contrast, look SICK and WEAK, historical repulsors for mate-seeking males.

Just the two bits worth from a normal, healthy American man.

59 posted on 12/19/2002 6:40:38 PM PST by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
Contrast this with the alleged "supermodels". Most fashion models are taller, thinner, and bonier than most porn actresses. Many do, in fact, resemble heroin addicts.

I've met Claudia Schiffer, Frederique, Daniela Pestova...they are impossibly sexy in person, all curves. Only thing different is they're about 5'10" tall. The lesser models like Kate Moss are gross thin, but serve a different role. I've also met alot of "adult" actresses, most have perfect bodies and are around 5'6". A few are as stunningly beautiful as the pro models. (I met one at the Mirage tuesday and almost knocked over some high dollar statue when she smiled at me).

As far as the article goes, they have it 180 degrees wrong. For 40 years, Hefner's type was tall long hip blondes; natural, no muscle tone. Now it's more the "adult" actress type..hardbodies, shorter, younger, leaner.

No fem writer would ever admit the truth about what men desire in physiques of these famous models, because then they've have to admit that it takes working out hard in the gym every day to create these bodies.

175 posted on 12/19/2002 8:09:37 PM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Long Cut
Why MODELS, on the other hand, are skewed towards the "gaunt, waif" look probably DOES have more to do with the preference of the clothing designers they work for than previously thought.

It does, and it's a simple as this: it's easier for them to design runway clothes for women with this type of figure.

316 posted on 12/20/2002 6:32:05 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson