A chat room helped Westerfield prosecutors

San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 12/12/02 | Alex Roth

[Jaded]

Whatever, you are two peas in a pod. Well actually, there are four of you. Kindred Spirits? How touchy-feely PC.

[Jaded]

Your point appears to be what ever suits your intent, which changes depending on which poster you are addressing. Your whole position that because one posts a link one is somehow allied with groups linked on that page is totally outrageous. It doesn't reflect well on you. Some of your friends post on 1B does that mean they are as anti-rights and anti-constitution as some of those folks? By your reasoning, if Jackson, Clinton, Gray Davis or any other Democrat were opposed to terrorism, would you then think it a good thing because you don't like their agenda? Be careful how you swing that blade while you're trying to bait people.

You and your ilk seem to go out of your way to make some of the most absurd claims while screeching about others. You need to check your own tin foil.

BTW Because They Whined is linked on my page as well as their opposite, so what?

[EllaMinnow]

Okay.
So, I was right. You didn't read the website, you just read the article. It fit your agenda, so you posted it.

[cyncooper]

You and your ilk seem to go out of your way to make some of the most absurd claims

For instance?

[cyncooper]

Good morning, fellow traveler--in a world where the sky is blue and 2 + 2 = 4.

[EllaMinnow]

Good morning to you, too.

[CW_Conservative]

The fact that the jacket contains the maximum amount of Danielle's DNA and so little of DW's is quite frankly a joke. After being cleaned it is unreasonable to think that Danielle's DNA would not have degraded at all, while DW's did.

You are assuming that both DNA's were left at a similar or same time. There is no reason to assume such a thing. DW's DNA could be from a much older stain that had undergone several cleanings as well as exposure to air and light for a much longer period of time thus more degraded.

I am not assuming, I am offering a reasonable interpretation of the evidence, as are you. Since this is a circumstantial evidence case, the interpretation pointed towards "not guilty" wins.

The fact that Danielle's DNA was undegraded indicates it was more recently left.

The fact that her DNA did not degrade after dry cleaning is ridiculous. But I agree her DNA was more recently left on the jacket, sometime after Feb. 4th.

The differing states of the two DNA is really a non starter red herring.

It was a non starter to those ignorant jurors, I'll agree there.

[Jaded]

Good to see you again. I appreciate your diligence in reviewing the transcripts.

j

[demsux]

Kindred Spirits?

Sounds like some kind of coven thing.

[cyncooper]

Take a look at #489. Some people are i-g-n-o-r-a-n-t.

[EllaMinnow]

I've got him on neglect. I refuse to pay any attention to someone so low as to link to a group of incestuous pedophiliac pornographers.

[cyncooper]

Yes, I agree. Also this person has the temerity to say Kim should get a life, all the while engaging in bizarre and slanderous "research". Back to "ignore".

(Interesting to note the "hail fellow well met" greetings to and fro...condoning such distasteful behavior.)

[Jaded]

Just pc.

Hope you had a great Christmas!

[cyncooper]

See what I mean?

[EllaMinnow]

Yes, and it makes me laugh at the pathetic obviousness of it all.

Happy New Year, Cyn.

[cyncooper]

Happy New Year, to you, too, red.

(Doesn't it seem like yesterday "Y2k" was THE topic?)

[EllaMinnow]

And on January 1, 2002, we had never heard the names Danielle van Dam or David Westerfield.

[JudyB1938]

I wish we'd still never heard those names. It's obvious though that some of us really care - on both sides of "the fence".

I hope in the New Year that the people I've come to know and LIKE on these threads will be able to be nicer to each other. I just can't stand all of the fussing and fighting. That's why I stay out of the fray. But I do continue to lurk and wish to thank the ones who keep us updated.

God Bless You All and keep your families safe. And you young gals be especially careful in shopping malls! It's not just the little ones who are being preyed upon.

Love,
Judy

[bvw]

Thought a couple swingers were on the cable show "Designing for the Sexes" a few days back. That's a show where a dapper english accented home and interior designer helps a couple resolve some design differences. It was the couple with that strange rec room with the trekkie mural. The designer sort of suggested it at the end with a comment about "boogeying the night away".

Big long room. The husband's end was redone into a three row movie theater with well cushioned benches for seating, the wife's end had a nice comfy seating group, and between a wet bar and dance floor.

Wonder what was playing on the big wide screen there?

[Valpal1]

Call the jurors names if you want, they did their jobs contientiously and I will not fault them for doing so. They saw all the evidence, up close and personal. You saw only a portion by remote. I'll take their ignorance over yours anyday.