first it was flegellum then it was live birth now its the eye do we have to show you how every little bit of evolution occurred to disprove Irreducible complexity? I would think when I debunked the flegellum that would have been enough. I can also do the same with the eye as we can still see in nature all the processes that lead to what we now know as the Human eye.
I wont even try just read this article
http://www.cs.colorado.edu/~lindsay/creation/eye.html
when I debunked the flegellum that would have been enough. And where did you debunk the flagellum besides in your own mind?
As to the eye spot, your article only says that because it happened more than once then therefore the eye spot could have occurred. It is not a refutation of the complex mechanism required for an eye spot.
BTW - a blog from Don Lindsay is proof of absolutely nothing. The guy cannot even give references for his nonsense.