How may times do I have to say siblings I mean can you even read the word siblings. Can you understand that mutations occur at the singular cellular level not in the adult multicellular creature.
So you are saying that only two individuals will carry these mutations, one male and one female, and the rest of the group will be left behind? Is that it?
The problem with that is that you must accumulate a lot of mutations to really transform a species. To say that all the mutations occurred in a single line within the group is equally ludicrous. You must remember that evolution says that these mutations are random and to propose that you can accumulate mutations from a single individual would make such transformations virtually impossible, certainly in the amount necessary to produce so many varied species with so many different mutations. Interestingly evolutionary theory contradicts itself on this point and proposes that the adaptation of entire species due to the environment occurs in whole groups also and that species gradually transform themselves into totally new species. So essentially evolution is taking both sides of the issue (as usual).
Im sorry I have given you proof and you continue to saw away with the same argument. Argue something new or dont argue can you do that say something that is actually intelligent.
Neither you nor any evolutionists has ever given proof that a single species has transformed itself into another more complex species. If I am wrong, let's see the proof. Come up with a real arguement that slams evolution can you do it?
There are many. The bacterial flagellum is one. The program by which a single cell at conception turns into a 100 trillion cells at the time of birth - with every single cell of the exactly proper kind in the exactly proper place is another. There are many more which have been scientifically proven, but these two should keep you busy for a while.