Replies

Sentis, You've contradicted yourself a few times. You say "I have just been having fun with you people who believe this Creation nonsense.", then go on to say later "I can't disprove he exists the same as you can't prove he does."

That is a perfect example of an evolutionist who wants a "bail out": you say Creation is nonsense but then go on to say you can't disprove it. You are leaving the door open, just in case. Why? Because you don't honestly believe that you, Sentis, evolutionist, evolved from 'bubbling primordial goo'. You like the idea of leaving the option of Creation open, should you find out in the end that the study of evolution was really a study of adaptation and the beauty of the Creator's work, as opposed to the haphazard, unguided, evolved Universe that you perceive it to be.

You said "If evolution was shown scientifically to be wrong and replaced with a more fullfilling theory evolutionists would give it up." You don't want me to start filling you in on the countless debunkings, do you? Or expose the lies and BS that the evolutionist camp has been driving down the public's throats since Darwin and even before him? By the way, speaking of incorrect material, there are textbooks and instructors in schools all around the world still preaching Darwin's blather. Let's work to clean 'em up, shall we? I have links I can provide if you would like. [Lurkers FReepmail me and I will hook you up].

Anyway, I like how you outlined your theories. Thanks for the read. I have to run now and get my wife some Christmas gifts. It's the most wonderful time of the year, ho ho. Happy Holidays.

MM wrote "Sentis, You've contradicted yourself a few times. You say "I have just been having fun with you people who believe this Creation nonsense.", then go on to say later "I can't disprove he exists the same as you can't prove he does."

How is this a contradiction I realize some of you don't understand scientific concepts but as basic a concept as "contradiction" should be easily understood. When I say Creation nonsense I am referring to the belief that The Universe was created 6-10 thousand years ago with all animals in place. I have pretty much confined my disgust to those who support this notion.

MM wrot "That is a perfect example of an evolutionist who wants a "bail out": you say Creation is nonsense but then go on to say you can't disprove it"

I said I can't disprove the existence of GOD not creation. Maybe I should create Two definitiond i will from now on refer to one group as irrational creationists, I think we know which ones these are, and rational creationists, those that believe in a creator who created the Universe with natural laws that encourage evolution to occur.

Your real problem is that you can't prove the existence of GOD.

MM wrote "you don't honestly believe that you, Sentis, evolutionist, evolved from 'bubbling primordial goo'. You like the idea of leaving the option of Creation open,"
MM wrote "

Well bubbling primordial goo isn't the term I would use more like bubbles of amino acids and the answer is yes. Regardless if God exists or not All creatures evolved from something like this. I actually would love for there to be a creator, a God that, loves his creation. The problem is there is no evidence for this being's existence. Absence of evidence leads me to take the position that he doesn't exist when and if evidence to the contrary becomes availible I will believe. Well possibly believe a creature that helped form the universe exists, if I am given evidence, his devinity will remain in question regardless of the proof. I would give him the respect I would give a parent but would not give him worship regardless.

MM wrote "You said "If evolution was shown scientifically to be wrong and replaced with a more fullfilling theory evolutionists would give it up." You don't want me to start filling you in on the countless debunkings, do you? "

Your debunking is probably as worthless as gore3000s debunking. The evidence against evolution seems to be primarily attacks that were old a hundred years ago. Creationists attack old theories and old statements. This debunking has little or nothing to do with modern genetics or evolutionary theory.

Darwin was a good man he went out with the express purpose of proving that the earth was young and that Creation was real. Instead he returned home with a profound belief that this was a very Old Earth and that animals had diverged in may ways. Was the theory he postulated perfect of course not. Was Newton's theory of physics perfect? Was Einstein's? No of course not Darwin's theory was genius he gave us a theory to work from not one that would last forever. His word is not holy writ however it did open the path to the truth.

Merry Christmas to you