Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sentis
Actually...

if you look at that geologic column and plate teutonics closely---

you would realize most of it formed from beneath and rather quickly too!

Any idea on how cambrian fossils are found on top of mountains?
910 posted on 12/19/2002 6:56:40 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies ]


To: Condorman
You are here.
911 posted on 12/19/2002 7:00:12 PM PST by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]

To: f.Christian
Where did you get your degree in plate techtonics? To use your own method of debate "No it doesn't, yes it does, no it doesn't."

Hmm cambrian fossils on mountain tops. Do creationists still bring this argument up even in this day and age, it was old in the days of Darwin. possibly because in the space of 4 billion years areas of the Earth's surface that were underwater get pushed upward when two techtonic plates meet to create mountains. When this happens one plate is submerged (in laymen's term it goes down) the other is pushed upward. This is not forming from beneath it is forming by an almost equal shift.

I've never had this debate with obvious creationists before. I am amused that your subculture has created an entire idiom of watch words you don't even seem to understand the meaning of.

Precambrian
geologic Column
Irreducible complexity


You say these words as if they are holy writ and they are meaningless to you outside of words to say when confronted by meaningful evidence.

You scream there are no precambrian fossils. When I show you some you scream there is no Geologic Column or it is wrong somehow. It exists and I am at a loss to even understand your fault with it. You don't explain what you want. You merely scream out a word and expect me to take this word as proof that evolution isn't real. What about the geologic column why doesnt it exist or why is it not as old as I think it is can you even explain yourself?

You can't have things both ways you can't scream there are no precambrian fossils then claim that the precambrian period never happened because the geologic column is somehow wrong.

When you express that there are no precambrian fossils your supposition is that there is a precambrian era for them not to exist within. When you say the Geologic column formed quickly your supposition is that there is no precambrian period at all. I showed you evidence of precambrian fossils this settles your first question of where they are (in museums all over the world). Your second supposition that the geologic column formed rapidly and that this proves there was no precambrian, this must also be an incorrect conclusion because I have proven the existence of fossils from a time you now state never existed.




Ok I gave you evidence and I asked you a question where is your fossil evidence of this Adam and Eve?

912 posted on 12/19/2002 7:25:07 PM PST by Sentis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson