So all that effort I put into explaining to you that speciation isn't a cut-and-dried separation event was for nought? The finch example is still fine evidence, speciation does not have to be total for the finches to be provide a good example of it, any more than donkey and horse, or camel and llama, or herring gull speciation needs to be total.
So all that effort I put into explaining to you that speciation isn't a cut-and-dried separation event was for nought?
Aaah, when all else is lost then comes the semantic excuse - what is the meaning of 'is', what is the meaning of 'alone'. A species is a group of individuals that can procreate and produce viable young. That is the only legitimate scientific definition of species. The finches can procreate and the evolutionists lied and continue to lie about the finches being an example of speciation and also an example of evolution. This has been shown to be false, period, paragraph, end of story.
Furthermore the evolutionists never bothered to check their facts and look to see if the finches actually mated and reproduced with each other. This shows them not to be scientists at all and that evolution is not science.