Insults do not help you. The fact is that you cannot genetically examine genetic material which does not exist. The only evidence evolutionists have of these millions of years old creatures is the bones and little else. So you cannot look at any genetic evidence. All you have to look at in 99.99% of the cases is bones - and 99% of the time just a very small portion of the total skeleton of the animal in question. So don't tell me they are working on this through genetics. All they have is appearances and appearances are not enough.
You give the appearances of a 13th century cleric trying to explain a jet engine test cell. Here, lets do another: All you have to look at the 99% of the cases is just a contraption made of glass and steel tubing. You have no proof that the images being displayed aren't produced by tiny microscope demons.
This is just another in your endless parade of rejections of induction, as practiced by modern science. You could end up being right occasionally, since induction is far from foolproof. Your disappointments will be many, since you are treading a road already picked pretty clean by micro-biologists, but your rewards will be all the sweeter for it, I'm sure.