[gore3000]

You refute a position that science does not hold, with great fanfare.

Every day we see evolutionist nonsense here using the molecular clock as a dating technique, glad you agree with me that such is total unscientific nonsense.

As to using it for the differences in species and see who came first, this is also nonsense. You have to disprove my statement that species stopped mutating shortly after they arose. Otherwise even this use of the clock is total nonsense also.

[PatrickHenry]

Placemarker.

[f.Christian]

Just calling evolution a theory is an overstatement . . .

only an idea // mood // feeling - - -

an ideology === perverse oddity ! ! !


To: f.Christian

Conjecture masquarading as science might be more appropos - I agree.


71 posted on 01/21/2003 12:04 PM PST by Havoc ((Evolution is a theory, Creationism is God's word, ID is science, Sanka is coffee))


Main Entry: 1con·jec·ture
Pronunciation: k&n-'jek-ch&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French or Latin; Middle French, from Latin conjectura, from conjectus, past participle of conicere, literally, to throw together, from com- + jacere to throw -- more at JET
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete a : interpretation of omens b : SUPPOSITION
2 a : inference from defective or presumptive evidence b : a conclusion deduced by surmise or guesswork c : a proposition (as in mathematics) before it has been proved or disproved

[donh]

As to using it for the differences in species and see who came first, this is also nonsense. You have to disprove my statement that species stopped mutating shortly after they arose. Otherwise even this use of the clock is total nonsense also.

Oh, really. And if you say "the sun shines black" do I have to disprove that too before you will bother to read anything on the subjects you wish to expound on?