Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
Well Don, your "scientifically fruitless to consider" sounds a lot to what I said. No matter what you call it, science says its scientifically impossible.

Very well. Point me to an array of articles in a micro-biology journal that supports your thesis, and I'll go read up on it.

6,229 posted on 01/31/2003 10:31:34 AM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6219 | View Replies ]


To: donh
Very well. Point me to an array of articles in a micro-biology journal that supports your thesis, and I'll go read up on it.

We have been over this already:
"The Origin-of-Life Prize" ® (hereafter called "the Prize") consists of $1.35 Million (USD) paid directly to the winner(s). The Prize will be awarded for proposing a highly plausible mechanism for the spontaneous rise of genetic instructions in nature sufficient to give rise to life. To win, the explanation must be consistent with empirical biochemical and thermodynamic concepts as further delineated herein, and be published in a well-respected, peer-reviewed science journal(s).
From" Origin of Life .

If there was a scientific explanation, the prize would have been claimed already. As we have been discussing, there is no way that any theory of life from matter can fit in what is scientifically known about life, that is why scientists do not propose such stuff. Also the law of Biogenesis - that life comes only from life is still completely accepted by the scientific community.

6,282 posted on 01/31/2003 10:02:12 PM PST by gore3000 (Evolution is whatever lie you want it to be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson