Says who?
The disclaimer you defend is targeted at evolution, period.
So? Is the disclaimer false? We're back to square one here.
That you have, since coming on the thread, said that you would allow similar disclaimers on every other "theory," including the "theory" that your great-great- great-great grandparents once existed, is a throw-in. That is, it's a meaningless concession to get to a coveted goal.
It is? I don't know quite what you mean. What is my "coveted goal", Kreskin?
Anyway, even if you're right about whatever it is you think my sinister motives and "meaningless concessions" are, that still wouldn't prove a damn thing about whether it's ok for that state school board to put the disclaimer thingy.
Seriously, why do you think that proving stuff (or guessing stuff) about my biography will help prove that that state's school board decision is wrong?
Anyway, the goal is to smear evolution, your target,
Evolution is "my target"? Says who?
Perhaps you haven't noticed, but if you look at my various posts on this thread you'll probably see that I basically believe in "evolution". It's hilarious how wrong you are, and how hard you're working to grasp at such pointless straws.
You honestly do seem to think that ad hominem is a persuasive form of argument. If you can just prove that I'm a creationist fundie, then you'll win the argument!!1 Right?
There are enough ignorant people out there that "only a theory" will suffice for now.
I agree. See, I've heard many ignorant people who say things like "EVOLUTION IS INCONTROVERTIBLE SCIENTIFIC FACT". The minor, painless, truthful act of telling them that it's a theory will improve their knowledge. And that's all I'm interested in. What are you interested in, Kreskin? (I mean, besides weak and pathetic attempts at mind-reading....)
Your protests that I can't see what is going on here are laughable. Anybody can see what is going on here.
Well, I'm sure laughing. I don't know what the heck you're talking about. What's "going on here"? Seriously, what are you talking about?
So? Is the disclaimer false? We're back to square one here.
Interesting that to evolutionists the truth of a statement does not make it valid for publication! Sorta tells you a lot about evolution and evolutionists.