Yes, I was thinking along the same lines. It occurs to me that if one were to go to a Astrophysics Symposium as ask participants to discuss their views on the "biological/cosmological theory of evoultion" they would think you were nuts. Similarly, go to a Biology Symposium and ask the same question; the result will be the same.
THe only thing I can figure is that if you go to a Creationist Convention and ask the same question, a hundred people will raise their hands and say "me first!"
This has to be either an incredibly bad misunderstanding on the part of Creationists, or a deliberate strawman they delight in knocking down.
Lastly, has anyone seen this "biological/cosmological theory of Evolution" published in any mainstream peer-reviewed science journal? Does anyone know who first proposed it, and what exactly it says?
OTOH, there IS a well-established theory ABOUT the "evolution" of the Universe...... it's commonly called "Big Bang" Cosmology, but as you know, it has nothing to do with Darwin....
I don't think uses that exact phrasing, but it certain brings all of it together and has a strong proponent, Francis Crick - one of the discoverers of the double helix. More on the subject can be found at Cosmic Ancestry