What evolutionists say is NOT that men evolved from chimps. They say modern chimps and modern men both evolved from some common ancestor species. That is why morphological gaps exist. Species have finite lifetimes, so any smooth intermediaries between chimps and men can be taken off the books as wiped out. Evolution, when observed from any present moment, looks like a few late-autumn leaves, each on distinct, widely separated branches, because most of the leaves have fallen long ago. The model of evolution as a linear chain between men and chimps is an innacurately simplified model of evolutionary theory.
No matter - this also would be a conclusion that has nothing to do with the premise, to wit: X is similar to Y in Z, therefore X and Y evolved from K. Huh? that doesn't follow either, does it?