Replies

Oh no, I do not wish to change a bit of what I said, I think that your logic with the 7 days is wonderful, I do not agree with some of it, but your spiritual thinking is so close to the mark of what I believe, that I will not argue it. Funny that we come close to the same conclusions, but from totally different sources. Interesting.

Oh, no, I would NOT change a thing that I said. I am NOT an ID'r because ID CANNOT be proven scientifically, but I would LOVE to discuss this in a philosophy class!!

Oh, yes, you are quite the philosopher, I like it, I like it a LOT. Religion and philosophy do not belong in a science class, you understand that, but, sad to say, a lot do not.

Jeepers! Thank you again so very much for the kudos (blushing here...)

I am NOT an ID'r because ID CANNOT be proven scientifically, but I would LOVE to discuss this in a philosophy class!!

For anyone interested, there are excellent philosophy threads on Free Republic and wonderful debaters, e.g. betty boop, cornelis, Phaedrus. A few examples:

On Debate and Existence: Excerpts from Voegelin

Stephen Wolfram on Natural Selection

IMHO, any offering of proof for intelligent design that uses a process of elimination will be written off by most scientists to the anthropic principle. However, that dismissal would not apply where an I.D. hypothesis can be evidenced empirically.

It appears that I.D. recognizes this challenge and is beginning a response: Becoming a Disciplined Science:Prospects, Pitfalls, and a Reality Check for ID: Dembski, William A.