Yup, amazingly stupid but not amazing that you think it is great. As the award winner I would not expect you to post anything that is true. In fact the first 'lie' it 'disproves' is by a total lie which has already been discussed here:
Biological evolution is a change in the gene pool of a population over time, and that's it! Any creationist who says differently is a liar.
As already pointed out numerous times, you cannot get from a bacteria to a human being by just rearranging the genes in the gene pool. A bacteria has some 600 genes and a human some 30,000 genes. A bacteria has a genome of some one million DNA base pairs, a human a genome of some 3 billion DNA base pairs. Therefore, you cannot get from bacteria to man without a lot of creatin' going on.
What this shows is that the evolutionists here, in the site mentioned, in talk origins, in textbooks, are ashamed of the so called 'evidence' they have for evolution. They know quite well that they cannot justify the tremendous amount of creation necessary for evolution to be true and they are trying to keep the lie alive by totally changing the meaning of the theory of evolution. A quick look at Darwin's definition of the theory of evolution:
"It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense, being Growth with Reproduction; Inheritance which is almost implied by reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the external conditions of life, and from use and disuse;. a Ratio of Increase so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural Selection, entailing Divergence of Character and the Extinction of less-improved forms. Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows."
From: Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life"
Just by comparing Darwin's definition to that which evolutionists now claim the definition to be shows quite clearly what an empty shell the theory has become.