Replies

When someone takes an article whose heading is "The Definition Evolution Shell Game" and claims that it supports a definition which it calls misleading is an absolute liar, especially when he continues to insist that the article supports it after the dishonesty has been pointed out. -me-

You continue to try to deny that this site did not support the phony definition of evolution you posted. Your total dishonesty in continuing to attack me for pointing it out shows you are an absolute liar. Here's the facts not the garbage rhetoric (oh, and BTW - I was abslolutely justified in not accepting your 'explanation' that it was an 'honest mistake' as your subsequent posts have shown you to be an unashamed liar):

To: Condorman

Sounds like "evolution lite" to me; a definition you've chosen to adopt for yourself.-fester chugabrew-

This is not my definition. Even Creationists use it. From here:

Dishonestly turning around the whole meaning of the quote by deleting the words I have underlined. What this shows Condorman, is that you are a liar and very dishonest.

The Evolution Definition Shell Game

The term evolution often takes on several meanings in today's scientific circles, often in very misleading ways. A 1999 undergraduate college textbook on Biology states: "Evolution is a generation-to-generation change in a population's frequencies of alleles or genotypes. Because such a change in a gene pool is evolution on the smallest scale, it is referred to more specifically as microevolution"
1817 posted on 12/31/2002 5:51 PM PST by gore3000

To: Condorman

The website I cited is a Creationist website that agrees with the definition of evolution I posted:

Not only are you a liar, you are a shameless liar. With the post showing that the site calls the definition you gave MISLEADING (which you dishonestly did not post) and with the article named THE EVOLUTION SHELL GAME you dare to say that the site supports your definition? You have no shame. The post showing your dishonesty is: Post# 1817
1897 posted on 01/01/2003 9:52 AM PST by gore3000

The term evolution often takes on several meanings in today's scientific circles, often in very misleading ways. A 1999 undergraduate college textbook on Biology states: "Evolution is a generation-to-generation change in a population's frequencies of alleles or genotypes. Because such a change in a gene pool is evolution on the smallest scale, it is referred to more specifically as microevolution". This type of "evolution" is widely accepted by evolutionists and creationists alike and is not in dispute.
Source: EvolutionFairyTale.com

What does the phrase "not in dispute" mean, please? Why did you omit it?

I was abslolutely justified in not accepting your 'explanation' that it was an 'honest mistake' as your subsequent posts have shown you to be an unashamed liar

Oh, for the record, I never claimed my statement was an honest mistake. I said I wasn't a liar. Here is the text from post 1922. I know this is asking quite a bit, but you might try reading it carefully:

I did not deliberately lie. Your post DOES highlight a fairly significant lapse in reading comprehension, but my statement was not an intentional falsehood.

You're going to have quite a time climbing out of this hole, my amusing little demagogue.