[Aric2000]

What my religious beliefs are, have nothing to do with the science of evolution.

Science and religion are 2 separate entities.

My religious beliefs, I keep totally separate from my scientific views.

One is philisophical, the meaning of life, morals etc. Religion

one is logical and fact based. Science

They are kept separate, because they are like OIL and water, they do not mix. Religion is based on the unproven pretext of god. Science is based on provable facts.

There is a difference, even if most creationists do not wish it that way.

I keep the facts spearated from the emotion and religion. Sure, I have my own theological thinking as far as where the universe came from and how we all got here, BUT, it is NOT scientific, and therefore has NO place in a scientific discussion.

[f.Christian]

Keep telling your therapist...you are convincing me!

[f.Christian]

uni(self)-flux(evolution) polar(stuck) morphing!

[f.Christian]

where the universe came from and how we all got here, BUT, it is NOT scientific,

let me guess...space/glop spores!

[exmarine]

What my religious beliefs are, have nothing to do with the science of evolution.

I didn't ask you about your religion. If you aren't willing to defend your position, then you are not scientific. So, again, I ask you. If a creator did not create the universe and all of the order in it, how did it come into being? Was it by Chance? I am asking you for your scientific explanation of the origins of the universe. Also, I asked you about your philosophy, e.g. if you are a materialist. Why are you afraid of the question? In case you did not realize it, ALL SCIENCE has a philosophy behind it. 100% of it.

They are kept separate, because they are like OIL and water, they do not mix. Religion is based on the

Evolution is illogical, and is not based on real science. It is based on an atheistic/naturalistic worldview. First comes the worldview, then comes belief in evolution. Evolutionists say man evolved from chimps because the DNA is 97% similar. In logical terms, this would be stated: X is similar to Y in Z, therefore Y evolved from X. The conclusion has nothing to do with the premise. It is an illogical conclusion (known as the Law of the Excluded Middle). Something that is illogical cannot be scientific.