Yup, just like you said. Your argument there says perfectly that multiple universes are just as unlikely to be fact as religion. After all, "it claims something to have happened which we know absolutely nothing about." -ME
Now that is a pretty ridiculous statement. Are you denying your own existence? Do you hate God so much that to deny him you are willing to say you do not even exist? Are you so far out as to say such a thing? -YOU
WHAT? Please explain how you made the conclusion that I doubt my own existence or doubt the existence of the universe. Intelligent Design and Multiple Universes are not the competing theories here. TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SARCASM, ALL I SAID WAS THAT THE MULTIPLE UNIVERSE THEORY WAS JUST AS 'FAITH BASED' AS ANY RELIGION. THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIAL, HARD EVIDENCE FOR EITHER. You deny your own religion when you laugh at theories that have no evidence.
Do you or do you not agree that there is no hard evidence which supports any of the world religions and therefore creationism? I will concede all day, and all of the night, that there is no evidence which supports multiple universes.
They certainly are. According to scientists (even to such an atheist as Hawkings) they are the only possibilities. You yourself seem to reject the theory of multiple universes so the only possibility then is Intelligent design.
Now it might be true that the above does not tell us who the designer was. However, it does disprove materialistic atheism. Your attempt to pit one religion against another to claim all are false does not work. That there is a designer tell us that at least one religion is correct and that there is a Creator to which we owe respect to.