You attack me for saying that there is no evidence for evolution when you yourself admit that it is impossible to give such evidence!!!!!!!!
Seems the latest attack on my posts by evolutionists is that I point out the obvious. Well, gee whiz, if what I say is obvious then why do evolutionists act as if it is irrelevant? Science has to account for the facts and if the facts are obvious, then they by definition cannot be discounted as evolutionists try to do.
(Discounting, of course, the simple fact that we CAN indeed show him speciation on micro organisms and plants in a lab situation... but oh yeah, creationists have that one covered since that doesn't really count. Touche).
Maybe others say that lab experiments do not count. I do not. I believe a lot in lab experiments. They can teach us (and have indeed taught us a lot). However, what I do object to is the claim that speciation = evolution. It does not. Evolution requires the transformation of a species into a more complex one, not into one with the same complexity, features, abilities, etc. which is the case with all lab experiments. The flies may not be able to mate in some experiments (who would want to after all the stuff they put them through!) but they do not have any greater complexity after the experiments than before, in fact they probably have lost viability because the greater the pool of alleles in a species the more viable it is. This is a well known scientific fact which evolutionists constantly ignore.