[gore3000]

I observed that scientists tend to bucket bizarre observations under the anthropic principle - bringing research to a halt on their own, just shy of saying God did it. There is no substantive difference in my view.

True, and we may as well mention that evolutionists say that 'natural selection did it'. This is even worse that saying that 'God did it' because natural selection can only destroy, it cannot create as God can. The other replacement for God which evolutionists/materialists use is random chance. This of course is totally unscientific and destroys scientific inquiry because science is all about finding order in nature. Luckily scientists have not paid attention to this nonsense and continue looking for and discovering the order in nature.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so very much for your post!

Luckily scientists have not paid attention to this nonsense and continue looking for and discovering the order in nature.

I couldn't possibly agree with you more. Truly, I believe such scientists will continue to find, throughout nature, information content - which is both the evidence of algorithms and the residue of intelligent design. For lurkers interested in my two cents:

post 103 on the weakness of the randomness pillar

post 324 on testable claims for Creation

I'm praying for you a Happy and Blessed New Year!