IOW, you're waiting for some evidence, any evidence, for what you'd rather believe. You're also waiting for a preponderance of hard evidence against what you wish were true to go away. But the preponderance is multi-source, large, and longstanding. You're also ignoring that science--for all its fits, starts, and corrections--doesn't just flop around randomly but rather converges upon an increasingly accurate representation of reality.
The evidence we have now isn't going to go away. You pretend it's perfectly reasonable, scientific even, to do what you're doing when it's nothing of the sort.
Quite an admission for someone who when the scientific evidence is totally against them keeps on claiming that an atheistic solution not showing intelligent intervention is still possible after all of scientific theories, experiments and observations for over a hundred years have verified that the Universe is not random and that abiogenesis is impossible.