Replies

Your desperation has reached such great heights that now you are bashing the forum which kindly gives allows you to express your views.

Again, you are a very simple man. I simply said that making a good argument or asking a question which cannot be answered here on free republic by no means can "prove" or "disprove" something. You are a fool who claims to have "thoroughly disproven" evolution by posting a few questions and some dubious figures on a free republic thread. I am not bashing this site, you are twisting everything around (surprise!).

I have met some of the most intelligent and well read people around here at free republic. Do I think they are THE MOST intelligent people in the world about every subject in the world? Do I believe they are all extraordinarily well studied in evolution and microbiology? I'm sure some are, but most are not. Stumping a surfer on free republic does not prove your theory nor disprove theirs.

And it is this belief that you have thoroughly disproven evolution here on free republic that leads me to conclude you are a simpleton. Now argue against this logic directly. I am making a claim that you cannot refute, therefore any claim you have against being a simpleton is false. I'm you.

By the way, you have never responded to my statement that I have disproven God using your logic...

How old is the earth?

Since way back in post 1081, g3k has been asked: HOW OLD IS THE EARTH?. No answer yet, except for dodges, evasions, excuses, and attempts to provoke a flame war (and thus an excuse to have the thread pulled). It can't be all that difficult for someone who has surveyed all Nobel Prize winning work and has declared that it all disproves evolution. An intellect of such sweeping power should be able to give us his answer. HOW OLD IS THE EARTH?.

You are a fool who claims to have "thoroughly disproven" evolution by posting a few questions and some dubious figures on a free republic thread.

If the figures are dubious then you and your friends should be able to disprove them. They are not, that is why you cannot disprove them.

As I said, there is a wide availability of information on these subjects out there. They are easily available in books and the internet. That none of the evolutionists here can find a refutation shows quite well that my points are valid.

In fact, your descending to insults on every post, Patrick's constant insults and attempt at diversion, as well as the similar posts by other evolutionists for the last 400 posts or so, show quite well that I have hit the nail on the head regarding evolution and all you and the evolutionists here have to counter it is lame insults and rhetoric.