Are you going to completely ignore my post #1303 which points out your error?
Or are you going to completely ignore it like your error about circles and ellipses.
Actually I had not noticed your post. Nevertheless, it was proper to ignore it. It is the usual nonsense which evolutionists do of posting a lot of stuff that is true, but is absolutely not to the point being discussed. The post you were responding to, #1276 said:
For a supposed astronomer you do not even know your terms. It is called the LAW OF UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION it is far more than a theory. As I told physicist, by denying something which you know to be true you are being dishonest. If you are a radio astronomer you know that gravity has been observed. If you do not know it, then you are not a radio astronomer, so either way you are being dishonest.
You and your friends are trying to create confusion in order to try to dismiss my posts as nonsense. Specifically that gravity has been observed and evolution never has been observed. I ask all those who do not believe that gravity has been observed or do not believe that it is observable to go on top of a 20 story building and jump. This will have two benefits: one it will prove to you that there are indeed universal scientific laws, and two, it will rid the world of a few people lacking in common sense (and perhaps win you a posthmous Darwin Award!). Gravity is observed everyday by everyone. Evolution has NEVER been observed.
BTW - it is interesting that evolutionists when shown that some scientific statement is true, try to challenge the truth of a scientific theory instead of prove their own evolutionary theory. It shows clearly to me that evolutionists are quite aware that evolution is not a fact, but just rhetorical nonsense.
Your dissertation does not address anything on the above. It is what I call confusionism. Trying to divert from the point of the discussion with irrelevancies. The point was, and both you and physicist should be ashamed to have denied it, that gravity is definitely and absolutely true and observable. The same cannot be said for the phony theory of evolution.