Evolution is racist and you cannot deny it , that is why you call it an insult. As I pointed out in post# 1238 "Evolution is racist. It denies that all humans are children of God and asserts that some are more 'advanced' than others. In fact it asserts that there is a biological hierarchy of species and that humans are part of that hierarchy. So yes, racism is integral to evolutionary theory." You cannot deny it, so you call it an insult. Here is one of the many racist quotes from your friend Darwin:
In man the frontal bone consists of a single piece, but in the embryo, and in children, and in almost all the lower mammals, it consists of two pieces separated by a distinct suture. ~~This suture occasionally persists more or less distinctly in man after maturity; and more frequently in ancient than in recent crania, especially, as Canestrini has observed, in those exhumed from the Drift, and belonging to the brachycephalic type. Here again he comes to the same nclusion as in the analogous case of the malar bones. In this, and other instances presently to be given, the cause of ancient races approaching the lower animals in certain characters more frequently than do the modern races, appears to be, that the latter stand at a somewhat greater distance in the long line of descent from their early semi-human progenitors.
Darwin, Descent of Man, Chapter 2.
BTW - in addition to the above being racist, it is unscientific and has been disproved by science. Therefore, Darwin did not have the excuse that 'it is true', the statement was totally due to his inherent racism and to the inherrent racism of his theory.
Race-based slavery was practiced for centuries prior to the theory of evolution, and it was Biblically-based. Does "child of Ham" ring a bell?
You spout easily refuted irrelevancies; it is as if the very core of your existence depends upon your being right. Is your psyche that fragile?