[titanmike]

"Peer-reviewed" journals are a closed system and web sites an open system. On top of that, the subject is simple enough for anybody to understand. A major methodology by which scientists have purported to claim vast ages for geological formations has been unmistakably shown to be bunk. There's nothing anybody could say in a "peer reviewed" journal which would change that.

[Aracelis]

unmistakably shown to be bunk

We really should define terms. You and your references are expressing an opinion.

[PatrickHenry]

"Peer-reviewed" journals are a closed system and web sites an open system.

Ooooh, ooooo! Great point! You can't find great stuff like this in one of those stodgy old, closed-minded peer-reviewed journals: TIME CUBE .

[Doctor Stochastic]

Peer-reviewed journals are not a closed system. They do require that you can make a coherent argument though. If you believe that what you read on web sites is more accurate, you may be surprised.