It was answered and if you had bothered to click on the 'replies' button you would have found the answer, but then you did not really want to hear my response did you? Here it is:
Tell you what: I'll start work on that, as soon as you show me the proof that naturalistic abiogenesis could only have occurred by the spontaneous intantaneous transmutation of junkyard piles of misc. amino acids into working prokariotes, as you and Behe insist must be the case.
Nope, me and Behe say that God made life. It is the atheists and materialists that say that junkyard piles of amino acids (which BTW are not found in nature except in living things as part of the process of protein formation) randomly arranged themselves into DNA or RNA chains of some half a million bases long (even though amino acids are the product of RNA not the material from which it is made). It is to such ridiculous extent that atheists and materialists try to go in order to deny God his due.
1001 posted on 12/23/2002 8:54 PM PST by gore3000
Let me add this note to the response above. It is the Intelligent Design community that has been telling evolutionists that you a hurricane going through a junkyard will never make a Boeing 747. It is proof of the total bankrupcy (and dishonesty) of evolution and evolutionists that they are adopting this as their argument against intelligent design. As I keep saying, evolution dead, all that is left is to bury it.
I read your response. It had nothing to do with the question asked, and betrayed instead a fundamental misunderstanding of the question.
The claim by you and Behe that God made life is irrelevant. The important point is that both you and he reject naturalistic abiogenisis because of the impossibility of "amino acids randomly arranged themselves into DNA or RNA chains of some half a million bases long" in one fell swoop.
To restate donh's question: What evidence do you and Behe have that insists that life must have jumped from zero to fully formed cell in a single step?