Replies

Except that what Oller ( ... appearing on behalf of the Louisiana Family Forum, a Christian lobbying group) means by "mistakes" probably aren't mistakes, what he means by "major falsehoods" probably aren't falsehoods, and what he is trying to accomplish in all this is not what he is disclosing.

Haeckel's embryos and the moths were frauds, period. Evolutionists continue to use these frauds in textbooks. The finches have been shown to interbreed for some 20 years and the evolutionists continue to state they are different species. The fly with extra wings is one of the strongest arguments for ID but the evolutionists continue to say it proves evolution. The Hardy-Weinberg experiment is completely backwards - amino acids do not produce DNA, it is RNA reading the DNA code that produces amino acids. There is no excuse for these LIES to be continued to be promulgated in textbooks except that evolutionists do not care about science, do not care about the truth. They only care about promoting their atheistic agenda.

As I am not a scientist, nor a religious fanatic, I can see this debate without all of the mumbo-jumbo. Every branch of science has gone through incredible transformation and revolution over the past 2,000 years. Religion used to account for all explanations. Then we became smarter.

Meteorology: The Roman Gods brought down the rain. No wait, the Bible says that doors in the sky open and water pours out. All the way to what we know now about evaporation, cloud formation, and condensation/precipitation.

Biology: Bible says bats are birds, no wait! They're mammals.

Astronomy: Atlas holds us up, no wait, The earth is the center of everything and the sun revolves around us. Now we know that our sun isn't even the center of everything, just a tiny speck in the universe.

Physics: From ignorance to Newton to Einstein to quantum mechanics we've seen physical laws broken, adapted, and altered. But each time we find out more and sometimes the break in between revolutions is longer than the course of our lifetimes.

The list goes on and on. Why would evolution be different? We are constantly learning, even to this day. Simply because we don't understand everything about the past doesn't mean that we fall back upon the mistakes of our ancestors. Science will provide an answer, it has only been 100 years. How long was it between Newton and Einstein? Darwin to B. Rabbit may be just around the corner. Evolution may change, it probably won't be exactly what it is today, but this is science, a proven institution, not faith. You confuse the two.

Sorry for poor "typesmanship", I'm too lazy to edit today.