Skip to comments.
Evolution Disclaimer Supported
The Advocate (Baton Rouge) ^
| 12/11/02
| WILL SENTELL
Posted on 12/11/2002 6:28:08 AM PST by A2J
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,021-3,040, 3,041-3,060, 3,061-3,080 ... 7,021-7,032 next last
To: BMCDA; Physicist
"I thought the original question whas "where does wind come from?"
It was the original question, but things like atmosphere and gases, etc. were used to formulate the answer, so I think that moved it to the next question, "Where did matter come from?" Which leads to (ultimately, from the evolution POV) the question, "Where did the BB come from." Or, possibly more cogently, "How did the energy necessary for the BB to occur organize itself?"
To: VadeRetro
Those who will follow the evidence did follow the evidence. EmPHAsis on wrong syllABle! "Those who will follow the evidence did follow the evidence."
To: VadeRetro
OH MY! The whole 1953 Gish whale thang was proved wrong?? I guess I'll become an evolutionist now because I'm sure none of their half-baked ideas have been wrong.
"It's all like that."
"All" is one of those words that my dad used to warn me to be careful of because it has a tendency to ricochet. You've read "all" of ICR's stuff?
To: VadeRetro
Looks like a post by f.christian.
To: VadeRetro
IIRC = "If I Recall Correctly"
ROFL = "Rolling on the floor laughing"
BRB = "Be Right Back"
WYSIWYG = "What you see is what you get"
KISS = "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
YFIADB = "Your Father is a Duffle Bag"
WTF = "My disbelief knows no bounds"
To: Condorman
WTF = "My disbelief knows no bounds" KMA = Now you've upset me!
To: PatrickHenry
Looks like a post by f.christian. Editor wanted. Must work for peanuts.
To: BMCDA
"Theories and laws are two different critters and the one doesn't turn into the other. A scientific theory is an explanation whereas a scientific law is a mathematical description of an observed regularity."
Thank you! Now that's info I can use! (I did indeed have a tendency to think that a theory eventually becomes a law once it's validated.)
Speaking of math, I've been meaning to ask if anyone remembers the name of the mathematician involved in the OJ trial who was humiliated so horribly by those 'Rat lawyers trying to get OJ off? I need his name for something else I'm working on. Thanks.
To: viaveritasvita
You've read "all" of ICR's stuff? I suppose not. Who was it who said, "You don't have to eat a whole omelet to tell it's got a bad egg?"
To: viaveritasvita
But the answer to the question "where does matter come from?" in no way addresses the causes of wind.
We observe the phenomenon 'wind' whether our universe was created or not.
So what do you think, what causes wind?
3,050
posted on
01/05/2003 5:36:32 PM PST
by
BMCDA
To: VadeRetro
KMA = Now you've upset me! BMA = I respectfully disagree.
To: VadeRetro
KMA = Now you've upset me! IMHO, You remind me of the uncredited 8th dwarf--Crotchety...
(Duck, cover, run away!)
To: PatrickHenry
BMA = I respectfully disagree.LOL
3,053
posted on
01/05/2003 5:40:13 PM PST
by
BMCDA
To: Condorman
I truly wish I could read everything people give me or send me or provide links to not to mention all the things I prefer to read! I don't own a TV, so I do have lots of time for reading (thanks be to God! hehehe), but it does get overwhelming. All that to say that I do have to be discriminating in what I read; things out of Berkeley are not on the list. I think I mentioned that some of the things Berkeley teaches is credible. What LDV thinks about the flood is very intelligent and scientific and coherent and all and I've added what little I know about it to the mix, but it does nothing to overturn the evidences for the flood.
To: Condorman
Duane Gish is Sneezy's cousin, Sleazy!
To: tpaine; PatrickHenry
I don't propose anything for punishment for blasphemy; God will deal with that, my friend.
To: Condorman
Better watch it with the dashes--I took you for f.C there!
To: Condorman
"Venerable Geezer."
Is this the meaning of a back-handed compliment (no disrespect to the elderly! hehehe)
"New critters are dug up, brushed off and placed into the puzzle on a daily basis."
Yes, dug up! Not necessarily new. My first love in this whole "prove it" thang is archeology.
To: BMCDA
GFY = Please leave me alone.
To: VadeRetro
LOL! I figured that's what you meant.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,021-3,040, 3,041-3,060, 3,061-3,080 ... 7,021-7,032 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson