Rn, you are better with the bible than to quote a verse without its context.
A remembrance....PAST....We are looking BACK IN TIME at the sacrifice.
If you missed that part, fine, you missed it. But if you intentionally excised the remembrance part simply to make your point, then you need SERIOUSLY to consider what Bib Chr (Dan) is saying to you.
Your charge that he is an arminian is absurd and you simply know better.
Indeed BUT it is also a forward promise..that He will come again..THEN the rememberence stops because the bridgroom is HERE
You have the temple sacrifices being done while Christ is here and present ..looking BACK...to what ??? The law??? A shadow? An incomplete practice??
Hbr 10:38 Now the just shall live by faith: but if [any man] draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.
Which is true ?
Your charge that he is an arminian is absurd and you simply know better.
Nope not as silly as it sounds