[Corin Stormhands]

So, although you apologized for a misstatement, we insisted that you apologize for something more profound.

WHAT??!?!?!?!?!

What was more profound doc? Someone posted a thread, I said something to the effect of "why bother talking to them. I just got a nasty email about my family." It was in response to a rather tame comment Rn made but it made me angry.

One of the Catholics (this was during the time YOU were under the gun for your horrific freepmail to Dr. Brian) said that if I had been threatened I needed to turn the person in.

WITHIN THE HOUR I came back and said "it was not a threat it was just a snotty comment that made me angry."

If you guys weren't so thirsty for the blood of anyone who dares to disagree with you, it would have died right there.

Those are the facts. And you know it. Although WE ALL know you'll never admit it.

[RnMomof7]

This is history and really not productive..it sounds like 1st graders all of you...this diversion is straight from the pit of hell....

Who will be the one to put it down first?

[the_doc]

You actually insinuated that your family had been threatened in an e-mail (from RnMomof7). Even Dr.Brian concluded from your posts about her e-mail that that's precisely what had happened. But this was not the case.

In short, you should have apologized for lying. You never really did do so.

In my subsequent e-mail to you, I pointed this out and said I was prepared to go public with the details (since RnMomof7 had sent me a copy of what she had actually said). That's when you left FR.

Proverbs 28:1

[fortheDeclaration]

If you guys weren't so thirsty for the blood of anyone who dares to disagree with you, it would have died right there.

Amen!

They have the same 'spirit' as the Democrats do, do not make a mistake, for no apology will appease them.

Clearly, they must make Eph.4:32 symbolic like they do everything else they reject in the Bible.