To: jandji
No, they would not be easier to identify. There would be no distinctive, unique whorls, hence no fingerprints.
To: cookiedough
No, they would not be easier to identify. There would be no distinctive, unique whorls, hence no fingerprints.they would be infinitely easier to identify in this case. the perp's smoothed fingertips would be so different than all other 'whorl prints' in the house. the perp's fingertips would be so distinctive, because he had no 'whorls'.
98 posted on
10/28/2002 10:47:08 PM PST by
jandji
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson