Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Ignoring Marijuana Research
Sun News ^ | 14 September 2002 | Bruce Mirken

Posted on 09/15/2002 8:38:29 AM PDT by JediGirl

Early in the morning of Sept. 5, dozens of armed men stormed a respected medical facility where nearly 300 people desperately ill from cancer, AIDS and other illnesses got their medicine. Brandishing semiautomatic weapons in the faces of terrified patients, including a woman paralyzed from childhood polio, they destroyed all of the medicine and took prisoner the facility's operators.

The work of Osama bin Laden? Hamas? Some other international terrorists?

No. This particular terrorist raid was carried out by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

The facility they attacked was the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana ( WAMM ) in Santa Cruz, Calif. A co-op run entirely by and for seriously ill people - 80 percent of whom have terminal diagnoses - WAMM sold nothing. All of the medical marijuana grown was given to members without charge.

The facility was supported by the community and worked closely with local officials. According to County Supervisor Mardi Wormhoudt, WAMM operated in an "exemplary" fashion. After the raid - which had been planned and executed with no warning to the local government - Wormhoudt told reporters she was "appalled" by the DEA's action.

The patients WAMM served are desperately ill. For many with AIDS or cancer, marijuana is the only thing that allows them to tolerate the horrendous side effects of the harsh treatments that keep them alive. Others endure excruciating pain that conventional medicines have failed to relieve, but which marijuana helps.

Because of this raid, many of these people will die prematurely - agonizing, horrible deaths - because the only medicine that helped them has been taken away.

What could possibly motivate such cruelty?

Desperation.

All around the world, governments and scientific experts are coming to believe that marijuana shouldn't be illegal - that it is simply not dangerous enough to warrant arresting and jailing even social or recreational users, much less people using it to relieve symptoms of cancer or AIDS. The British government has already moved to make marijuana possession a nonarrestable offense.

On Sept. 4, Canada's Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs released the most exhaustive investigation of marijuana data and policy options ever conducted by any government. The 650-page report declared that criminalizing marijuana amounted to "throwing taxpayers' money down the drain in a crusade that is not warranted by the danger posed by the substance."

But marijuana - which accounts for the vast majority of illegal drug use and arrests - is the engine that drives the war on drugs and keeps massive drug-control budgets pumped up.

So even as DEA agents were shoving machine guns in the faces of sick people, White House drug czar John Walters and Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson stood in front of a Washington, D.C., press conference, spouting long-discredited myths as if they were proven facts.

Marijuana, said Thompson, is "a clear and present danger to the health and well-being of all its users" - a statement contradicted by reams of scientific research.

Indeed, in 1995, the prestigious medical journal The Lancet stated flatly, "The smoking of cannabis, even long term, is not harmful to health." This year, the British government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and the Canadian Senate committee came to similar conclusions after extensive study.

But our government's drug war ideologues don't care about science. And they don't care how many sick people they literally torture to death in their desperate effort to pump up a collapsing policy.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-398 next last
To: Libloather
You already got your answer ... now answer mine ... name one person who went to prison for aggrevated assault .... just one
301 posted on 09/15/2002 12:33:08 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I own a home in Florida, you fool.

In which voting district?

302 posted on 09/15/2002 12:33:34 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: AzJP
Besides, have you ever tried to swallow a pill when you're throwing up. It does tend to defeat the purpose...
303 posted on 09/15/2002 12:33:34 PM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
BUT just so you can't say you did not get an answer ... Lynette Herr ... neighbor spent the night in jail and lost her license for a roach found in her car. Left there by her teenage son. NOW call me a liar ... just to prove what a dishonest disingenuous POS drug warrior YOU ARE
304 posted on 09/15/2002 12:36:02 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
You already got your answer

Google: Your search - "Jeffrey M. Adams" marijuana - did not match any documents.

305 posted on 09/15/2002 12:36:27 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Oh, please. Spare me the drivel. I'm eligible to vote in Florida but am currently not in the state for work purposes and find it easier to vote where I'm at. However, I do indeed meet the residency requirements and will most assuredly be voting in Florida in November 2004 unless I befall any sad mishaps....
306 posted on 09/15/2002 12:37:30 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
"if the good people of Florida want to change their own laws, the Constitution well provides for that framework of self-governance." CJ


Tell us your position about our bill of rights CJ. Are states/localities obligated to observe them in their lawmaking ?
307 posted on 09/15/2002 12:38:19 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Huh? What difference does that make? It's in Fort Lauderdale in Clay Shaw's 22nd District.
308 posted on 09/15/2002 12:39:19 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
So ... I'm waiting ... I answered your dumba$$ question ... now answer mine or shut the F up.
309 posted on 09/15/2002 12:42:01 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Jeffrey M. Adams.

I'm impressed. Who the hell is Jeffrey M. Adams and what was Jeffrey M. Adams ever charged with?

310 posted on 09/15/2002 12:42:08 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
NOW call me a liar ... just to prove what a dishonest disingenuous POS drug warrior YOU ARE

Do you sometimes win these arguments against yourself?

311 posted on 09/15/2002 12:43:14 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
It was posted it liblover .... CJ ... but thanks for the comic relief as I was getting a little peturbed at him
312 posted on 09/15/2002 12:44:32 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
And, in case your wondering, it's in the 25th State Senate district and the 91st State House district. I'm glad you find this so germane to the argument here...
313 posted on 09/15/2002 12:45:25 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
It was posted it liblover = posted for

It's hard to watch football and type at the same time

314 posted on 09/15/2002 12:45:37 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Football time ... signing off
315 posted on 09/15/2002 12:46:33 PM PDT by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Here in Abilene, five people that we know of have been charged. Edgar Baltazar Garcia, Jason Middleton, Jeffrey Adams, Macheo Hill, and Jerry Sanders. They face a variety of charges involving the possession and selling of Cocaine, Methamphetamines, and Marijuana. There are Money Laundering charges, and a number of firearms charges as well. The next stop for them is Lubbock, where they'll stand trial in a federal courtroom. If found guilty, each of them faces life behind bars."

http://www.krbctv.com/news_archive/1011147493.html

316 posted on 09/15/2002 12:48:07 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
neighbor spent the night in jail and lost her license for a roach found in her car. Left there by her teenage son.

And this is all the fault of other people how exactly?
(please print)_____________________________

Liberals are always coming up with whiney excuses for bad behaviors. Don't be a liberal.

317 posted on 09/15/2002 12:48:25 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Huh? What difference does that make? It's in Fort Lauderdale...

Voting machines don't seem to work very well in that kind of humidity - eh?

I'm still curious about how many fools reside in Floriduh...

318 posted on 09/15/2002 12:50:00 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
Hehhe. Enjoy the game, clamper1797!
319 posted on 09/15/2002 12:50:11 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
What is the relevance of this? Money laundering is rightfully a crime in its own right. Firearms charges are (usually wrongfully) separate crimes in their own right. Selling of cocaine & methamphetamines are covered under their own provisions much like marijuana is currently illegal even though alcohol is legal. The decision to legalize marijuana is not a decision to legalize cocaine or meth. In fact, most of the crimes here are only crimes because drugs are illegal in the first place, and if your argument rests on the 'associated crime' issue then the fastest way to eliminate the crimes associated with Prohibition is to eliminate Prohibition.
320 posted on 09/15/2002 12:51:00 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-398 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson