Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Ignoring Marijuana Research
Sun News ^ | 14 September 2002 | Bruce Mirken

Posted on 09/15/2002 8:38:29 AM PDT by JediGirl

Early in the morning of Sept. 5, dozens of armed men stormed a respected medical facility where nearly 300 people desperately ill from cancer, AIDS and other illnesses got their medicine. Brandishing semiautomatic weapons in the faces of terrified patients, including a woman paralyzed from childhood polio, they destroyed all of the medicine and took prisoner the facility's operators.

The work of Osama bin Laden? Hamas? Some other international terrorists?

No. This particular terrorist raid was carried out by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

The facility they attacked was the Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana ( WAMM ) in Santa Cruz, Calif. A co-op run entirely by and for seriously ill people - 80 percent of whom have terminal diagnoses - WAMM sold nothing. All of the medical marijuana grown was given to members without charge.

The facility was supported by the community and worked closely with local officials. According to County Supervisor Mardi Wormhoudt, WAMM operated in an "exemplary" fashion. After the raid - which had been planned and executed with no warning to the local government - Wormhoudt told reporters she was "appalled" by the DEA's action.

The patients WAMM served are desperately ill. For many with AIDS or cancer, marijuana is the only thing that allows them to tolerate the horrendous side effects of the harsh treatments that keep them alive. Others endure excruciating pain that conventional medicines have failed to relieve, but which marijuana helps.

Because of this raid, many of these people will die prematurely - agonizing, horrible deaths - because the only medicine that helped them has been taken away.

What could possibly motivate such cruelty?

Desperation.

All around the world, governments and scientific experts are coming to believe that marijuana shouldn't be illegal - that it is simply not dangerous enough to warrant arresting and jailing even social or recreational users, much less people using it to relieve symptoms of cancer or AIDS. The British government has already moved to make marijuana possession a nonarrestable offense.

On Sept. 4, Canada's Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs released the most exhaustive investigation of marijuana data and policy options ever conducted by any government. The 650-page report declared that criminalizing marijuana amounted to "throwing taxpayers' money down the drain in a crusade that is not warranted by the danger posed by the substance."

But marijuana - which accounts for the vast majority of illegal drug use and arrests - is the engine that drives the war on drugs and keeps massive drug-control budgets pumped up.

So even as DEA agents were shoving machine guns in the faces of sick people, White House drug czar John Walters and Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson stood in front of a Washington, D.C., press conference, spouting long-discredited myths as if they were proven facts.

Marijuana, said Thompson, is "a clear and present danger to the health and well-being of all its users" - a statement contradicted by reams of scientific research.

Indeed, in 1995, the prestigious medical journal The Lancet stated flatly, "The smoking of cannabis, even long term, is not harmful to health." This year, the British government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs and the Canadian Senate committee came to similar conclusions after extensive study.

But our government's drug war ideologues don't care about science. And they don't care how many sick people they literally torture to death in their desperate effort to pump up a collapsing policy.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-398 next last
To: WyldKard
I mean, are you going to tell us "it takes a village a raise a child"?

LOL!! I think that's where this is headed any minute now....

201 posted on 09/15/2002 11:14:03 AM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Translation: "He got a free lunch, we demand one too!"

Roscoespeak: I'll indulge in my vices, but I'll be damned sure to prevent you from indulging in yours.

202 posted on 09/15/2002 11:14:20 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
And stop reading factually suspect third rank addled literature.

Speaking of addled....
Before you start admonishing people
for lack of historical rigor, you might
want to examine this PBS site.
 
 

203 posted on 09/15/2002 11:14:32 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: sawsalimb
I'll state from experience that,should any young man be contemlating a heroine habbit,contemplate one that isn't redheaded.

Yes...I speak from personal experience. I still can't make it through the day without getting the shakes from thinking about Jean Grey and Caitlyn Fairchild. I even had a problem with Emma Frost. Don't become like me, kids! aahahhhhhg! :)
204 posted on 09/15/2002 11:14:38 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Can we add fatty foods to your list? I just got back from breakfast, and I'm tellin' ya, the loads at Bob Evans shouldn't have been allowed anywhere near the breakfast specials.
205 posted on 09/15/2002 11:16:30 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
No, he's advocating constitutional freedom to 'doctor' himself, you 'Drug Czar' wannabe.
206 posted on 09/15/2002 11:16:45 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
...Yea, that Bill Hicks, a late friend of mine, dead comics society now. Steal all of my jokes from him. It's OK, he made jokes from serious conversations we had...
207 posted on 09/15/2002 11:18:50 AM PDT by gargoyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
It takes a socialist village to raise a socialist village idiot.
208 posted on 09/15/2002 11:19:18 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Tony Niar Brain
That's the gist I got from the article above.

In a vision? The article doesn't even mention chemotherapy.

209 posted on 09/15/2002 11:19:31 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
constitutional freedom to 'doctor' himself

Dopey.

210 posted on 09/15/2002 11:20:56 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl
Of course ganja research is being ignored. Keeping it (and other drugs) illegal insures continuing profits (from forfeitures, payoffs from cartels, etc) and increased power over each of our lives (not just drug users). Why would the guvmint willingly give up power and money? On principle? LOL.
211 posted on 09/15/2002 11:23:00 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Why are cigarettes and alcohol legal then? Should these be made illegal?

Are you advancing a socialist 'fairness' argument for the legalization of all recreational poisons?

212 posted on 09/15/2002 11:23:06 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
It was terrible. After she wadded up the tattered remnants of my heart,she tossed them in the sawdust and pulltabs(this happened a long time back) on the saloon floor. Then,on her way out the door,she made sure to grind them into the dirt with her spike heels. The Aztecs didn't have anything to teach that girl,I swear...
213 posted on 09/15/2002 11:23:15 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Or did you mean something else?

Didn't mean anything other than copying Liberteen words and terms.

Got tons of those Wonder Woman/Catwomen comics - do ya?

214 posted on 09/15/2002 11:24:18 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: avenir
I think you know better, but are currently on the chronic and need to rationalize it.
I am not sure what this sentence means? I cannot parse it. However, I can say again - I don't smoke (neither pot nor tobacco) because I believe that smoking is bad for my health.
Doesn't mean I think that therefore it should be illegal.
I also think that there is a difference between drunkenness and a couple glasses of wine. (By the way, I currently don't drink either, but that is because I am on a diet and there are a BUNCH of carbohydrate calories in alcohol - not because I think that a moderate amount is bad for me.)
215 posted on 09/15/2002 11:24:59 AM PDT by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
No. I'm advancing the ideals of rational, consistent thought. I apologize if the concepts of logic and reason are just utopian figments of my communist imagination....
216 posted on 09/15/2002 11:25:36 AM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
In a vision? The article doesn't even mention chemotherapy.

Well, that's what is usually done to treat cancer patients, and the painful symptoms of which medical marijuana is supposed to help allievate, Doctor.

Once more, I ask you, how are these terminally ill people going to assault passers-by for their fix?

217 posted on 09/15/2002 11:26:18 AM PDT by Tony Niar Brain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Since when is doctoring yourself dopey? I guess we should toss the aspirin out of the cabinet,and head for the emergency room every time we have headaches.
218 posted on 09/15/2002 11:26:47 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I apologize if the concepts of logic and reason are just utopian figments of my communist imagination....

No need to apologize. Socialists and Libertarians are humanist moral-liberals, and generally agree on all social issues.

219 posted on 09/15/2002 11:27:59 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: traditionalist
If you ingest something and become a public charge, the public is stuck with the bill of keeping you alive. Hence the public has a right to prevent you from doing things that will make you a public charge.

This thread is about drug laws, not fried foods. You need to start another thread to discuss banning such things.

220 posted on 09/15/2002 11:28:13 AM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 381-398 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson