So did Bill Clinton. The good actors have range.
Wow. So, you have seen this interview already?
Wow! That's cold.
I'll type this really slow so you can understand it really well:
GEORGE BUSH IS NOT BILL CLINTON!
...sigh...
You may be ambivalent towards Bush, and I believe you when you say that you are, but I just scanned about five weeks worth of your posts, and didn't come up with one single instance where you have agreed with anything Bush has done, or where you haven't been highly critical of Republicans as a rule of thumb.
Well, to be fair, I did see you pay some compliments to at least two Republicans on another thread, so credit where credit is due:
"Kruse and Doyle are the only Republicans who even have a proposal that talks about looking at ways to cut spending, and the rest of the Republican scum won't even give it a hearing."
"However, there seem to be a great many people on this thread who would like to shout down even the hint of criticism of their hero."
This is where you need to use that mirror I asked you to get earlier, hold it up to your face, and look into the eyes of a hypocrite.
It's not the tactic that I object to, I'm guilty of doing very similar things, I don't even mind people who get a little crazy. It's the hypocrites that pick a fight, and then cry foul that piss me off.
You didn't intend to be critical of Bush, you intended to instigate an argument, and once the argument commenced, you start playing the role of victim.
You came in calling Bush dishonest, and comparing him to Clinton in order to get a reaction from other posters:
So did Bill Clinton. The good actors have range.
2 posted on 9/10/02 11:34 PM Eastern by Jolly Rodgers
Then, after you've successfully turned the thread into a flame war, you change your tone, and start acting like a victim.
You started this firefight, so quit the BS.
YOU, on the other hand, are a complete fake.