Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Illbay
After repeal, a great many states continued prohibition, and many counties, especially in the more law-abiding, more religious South, continue that law. So I would ask YOU: If it is legal for a county in, say, Alabama or Louisiana, to prohibit the sale of alcohol, then why is it NOT legal to have laws against dope?

That is exactly the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point. Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....
73 posted on 09/03/2002 8:57:31 AM PDT by vin-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: vin-one
...the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point.

That isn't the point, and I think you know it.

Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....

Most of the time it IS left up to the states. But just as kidnapping turns from a local to a Federal matter when the victim is transported across state lines, so the Feds get involved when dope trafficking does, too.

That's just so obvious to someone without "enhanced" neurons.

83 posted on 09/03/2002 9:02:27 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: vin-one; Illbay
To: Illbay
That is exactly the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point. Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....
# 73 by vin-one
*************************

A war on drugs carried out by a State government would be un-Constitutional, as well.

The drug laws are based upon a corruption of the Commerce Power.

A law based upon an un-Constitutional power is itself illegal.

238 posted on 09/03/2002 7:17:38 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson