To: Illbay
After repeal, a great many states continued prohibition, and many counties, especially in the more law-abiding, more religious South, continue that law. So I would ask YOU: If it is legal for a county in, say, Alabama or Louisiana, to prohibit the sale of alcohol, then why is it NOT legal to have laws against dope?
That is exactly the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point. Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....
73 posted on
09/03/2002 8:57:31 AM PDT by
vin-one
To: vin-one
...the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point.That isn't the point, and I think you know it.
Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....
Most of the time it IS left up to the states. But just as kidnapping turns from a local to a Federal matter when the victim is transported across state lines, so the Feds get involved when dope trafficking does, too.
That's just so obvious to someone without "enhanced" neurons.
83 posted on
09/03/2002 9:02:27 AM PDT by
Illbay
To: vin-one; Illbay
To: Illbay
That is exactly the point it is a state issue not the federal gov't. thanks for proving our point. Leave it up to the state not the fed.'s....
# 73 by vin-one
*************************
A war on drugs carried out by a State government would be un-Constitutional, as well.
The drug laws are based upon a corruption of the Commerce Power.
A law based upon an un-Constitutional power is itself illegal.
238 posted on
09/03/2002 7:17:38 PM PDT by
exodus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson