Replies

First the liberals and socialists infiltrated and destroyed the Reform Party. Now, disguised as "libertarians", they have moved on and are rapidly making the Libertarian Party a one-issue organization. They are committed to the idea that you can fool enough of the people enough of the time -- at least until the people are drugged up and dependent. After that, they figure, it won't matter. The rest of us know that liberals and socialists in other countries are playing the same song -- and with some success. That's why only those countries have legalized drugs or are seriously considering it. Well, they will not crucify America upon a cross of crack cocaine.

I'm laughing at your utter stupidity. First, I believe if anyone bears the blame for destroying the Reform Party, it's Pat Buchanan, who is hardly either a liberal or a socialist.

Secondly, what kind of idiotic response is "I didn't realize Buckley and Schultz were countries." You obviously can't handle, in an intellectually honest way, the fact that these two people, who's conservative credentials are flawless, are both in favor of ending the war on drugs. Why don't you at least make an attempt at addressing this fact rather than making yourself look like a blind and rigid follower of the War on Drugs?

So you avoid any attempt at reconciling this hole in your theory (because you can't) and instead simply make a wise-ass retort and dismiss that aspect of this complex situation.

You don't address it because you know it makes you a liar. Simple as that. There are conservatives who oppose the war on drugs. Me, Buckley, and Schultz among them. Again, tell me which is worse, socialism or fascism? I do believe you're very fond of creating a fascist state of America.

I do think it's very telling that I've asked you four times if you don't condemn fascism and you've completely ignored the question. I think my answer is right there. You're clearly the definition of a fascist.