Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Whilom
It was an is against the law, too.

Laws that violate basic concepts of freedom and justice need to be repealed and anyone who speaks out in favor of that is fully justified.

If your state passed a law that mandated you to house a homeless person for four weeks a year, that would be injust and you'd be right to argue against it, resist it, and/or ignore it if you could.

Lest you think this is a hypothetical scenario, you don't know some of the most notorious liberal politicians very well.

327 posted on 09/14/2002 7:59:42 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
Now you're getting down to the basic argument of the legalizers -- change the law or ignore it. Well, we've decided we'll enforce it. Running out of prisons? Don't worry, we'll build more. Like it better in Canada or Holland or California? Good luck.
328 posted on 09/14/2002 3:24:10 PM PDT by Whilom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
Poor tdadams. Writhing in hypothetical pain from illusory chains that mentally chafe his wrists.
330 posted on 09/14/2002 4:47:46 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson