[KentuckyWoman]

As I stated earlier, her/him posting a revised account of history does not make me a liar. It only makes the poster look uninformed.

Oops. Got in a hurry and left out a word. I'm not the one who posted the revisionist history. What I was referring to was written during the 1700s. What was posted back to me was written in either the late 1800s or early 1900s. I forget now and don't want to take the time to go back and re-run the google search.

[ravingnutter]

Oops. Got in a hurry and left out a word. I'm not the one who posted the revisionist history. What I was referring to was written during the 1700s. What was posted back to me was written in either the late 1800s or early 1900s. I forget now and don't want to take the time to go back and re-run the google search.Excuse me...what did I post from the 1800's or 1900's...you apparently are thinking of someone else. Both sources in my post were written THIS year on 07/29/02. Actually, it shocked me when I realized they were both written on the same date, believe me, I checked, I wanted to make sure I was not the insane one.