OK, let's see how logical that is:
A-unicornism requires an active belief system. Since no absolute evidence refutes unicorns' existence, one is required to reject (and reject and reject). A belief without absolute facts requires faith. Does your faith and belief make it true?
Nope. We're not required to try to prove a negative. OTOH, you have the positive belief, so you do require either positive proof (or at least good positive evidence), or else you're left with having to actively sustain your faith.
Jenny, I know you didn’t miss my point – you are ignoring my point.
Yes, I am aware of the “God of the gaps” theory, but the “godless filling the those gaps” requires more faith. (I believe)
(Super) Naturalism permeates the classrooms and Darwin should not be a anti-god leader in the schools.
You are in the 6% group here in the USA that does not believe in (a) God. Now sure you can go around asking the majority here why we are sooo stupid as to believe in God, but moving to China might be a better option.
It seems the burden of proof is on you…