Take any liberal rockstar, politician, highschool shooters, activists,& whatever....
...when they're accused of a crime, the media pulls folks out of the woodwork to tell us what good people they are....moms, sisters, friends tell us they couldn't have done such a thing.(& they tell us this with the media's blessings!)
Contrast this to the coverage of Westerfield.
I can't reasonably think everyone is so cowed by the media slant that some wouldn't have wanted to defend this guy....(his sister comes to mind, the one who visited him in jair often, and sat crying in the courtroom)...
...Where are these interviews?
...I'll tell you where.
The media doesn't want us to hear ANYTHING good about the man.....anything normal or redeeming.
We're to be good little sheeple and believe the garbage they're spewing, and just shut up!
I BET DW's sister would like to say some nice things about her brother.
Please, if I'm wrong on this......point me in the direction of the interviews his defenders were allowed to make.
It's just like it was on CourtTV.....anytime someone had the guts to question the evidence, they were ususally shut down!!
Come to think about it, it WAS right out of the Clinton Playbook. Media was all for the Van Dams and against DW, from the Gitgo.
Not surprising, especially since the same Liberals (Nancy Grace) defended Bill Clinton..they painted him in a different light than he actually was, and the sheeple bought it. They used their media power to give the VD's the edge and sought to demonize DW. It worked.
sw