[bvw]

My mama would be more polite. She would say "Boys will be boys."

Westerfield's mother was careless in her remark on that, and surely as careless in what she meant by it. I can't seem to sway you from this dead-end "presumption of guilt" mind-set you have persisted with in this case. It is -- like playing the victim, victimology, most difficult to throw off once established and thus by that difficult and divinely aided act of throwing it off to walk and see as a free man or woman.

[Freedom2specul8]

BVW, ..questioning other people's conclusions is NOT the same thing as saying he's guilty. The character issue, the blood, dna, fibers, hair and child porn..all totalled a big finger pointing at DW.

red's right..that was a defense tactic of the clinton defenders. People who thought that clinton was a typical horny stud, who said it was no big deal that he could get bj's under the desk while on the phone with what's his face trying to decide whether he was going ot send our boys to war...are beyond all hope. Disgusting. (see starr report for confirmation)


My opinion about the definition of horndog is not indicative of belief of guilty of kidnapping and murder. It's just one of many things.. (although it wasn't brought up in trial, so therefore really doesn't count)..like some of the stuff spewed about the vd's...it doesn't count cuz they weren't on trial.