He really did, and just yesterday I noticed some of the VDAs on Court TV actually saying that. Nearly fell out of my chair! Several "pundits" commented that Feldman has ample grounds for an appeal if DW is found guilty. I agree.
Now, CTV is replaying Dusucks closing argument, reading a transcript of the little girl poro rape scene and he called it "Anime".
Then he goes on to explain DW's sexual Beastiality fantasies..He's all over DW for the porno, saying his FANTASIES in the porno were played out with Danielle. Dusek was getting carried away with "make believe" in his closing arguments. Not a shred of evidence to substantiate his mental picture of what DW was thinking or doing.
I wonder if Dusek really believes his OWN fantasy, that he thinks demonstrates DW's motive to sexually assualt Danielle?
sw