Mudd Denies Access To Transcripts As Well As Lineage To Hussein: Van Dams' Sex Life Still In Play!

Union Tribune ^ | August 19, 2002 | San Diego Tribune

[Lucky]

Also Brenda said something to the police about DW but we don't know what.

[MizSterious]

In my opinion, they looked at Westerfield and only Westerfield because the van Dams pointed a finger at him, for reasons I can't be sure of--but it should be noted that almost as soon as they hired the P.R. firm, they also hired a good civil lawsuit attorney. Did they hope to win a lawsuit against him later, as in the OJ case?

This is from an older post of mine, not yet updated to include the testimony we have--but it's a real good start. First, here's the interview from February 5th, LEO to the SD local media, source is below:

Officer: During the course of our investigation, the resident here, his name came up, as someone who had contact with the family. We've talked to him. He is cooperating with us. He's talked to us yesterday, he's talking to us today. We had some things we wanted to check in his house. He allowed us to go into his home and we are doing some things to process the scene and possibly eliminate him as a suspect." Source

Second, there was an article in the San Diego Union-Tribune the same day, where another officer says something quite similar:

"This is a process of elimination," said Dave Cohen, a spokesman for the San Diego Police Department. "We have gotten some information and we wanted to take a little closer look at his vehicle and his residence." Source

And from the motion filed in court by Feldman:

"Detective Alldredge's affadavit was relied on to establish probable cause for search warrants 2783D and 27818 to search Mr. Westerfield's home. 27813 for Mr. Westerfields clothes. In his affadavit, Alldredge misrepresented statements by Brenda Van Dam that were relied on to supply probable cause for the issuance of the search warrants. Because the affadavits were sealed, documents may only disclose the specifics of the misrepresentations in camera."

So, from this, it appears Brenda said something, but that Alldredge might have altered it or exaggerated it. Bottom line, it looks like someone did point the police in a certain direction.

[spectre]

Coming from the three of you, that was a real compliment. :~)

sw

[clearvision]

The last of your three I believe is Brenda's comment about not telling DW about Danielle's FD dance. They made a big deal in the affidavit of going back to Brenda and confirming (we now know bogus) memory of the visit to DW's and what she said and Dad's.

[small_l_libertarian]

As per my reply on the other thread, I think she chooses not to know. But she's caught him at it before.

[clearvision]

On FOX someone commenting on Martha Stuart says she needs to worry about "the lowest form of life, congressmen, jackals". Does not say much for jackals...

[JLO]

That's all I remembered, also.

That's what so scary to me! A damn hose left out on the lawn, for pete's sake!

Who could be next, if a child neighbor of any of ours goes missing?

Be sure to roll up your water hose, so you're not first in line for questioning?

JLO

[JLO]

Hello Miz, this was actually what I was thinking about, in a round-about fashion.

Seems like the VD's or somebody.....pointed a finger at DW to start with. Must have been.

JLO

[Jaded]

The affidavits contain statements/fabrications by Brenda that were further misrepresented in order to obtain search warrants. David was the focus of the investigation within 13 hours, the parents were cleared within 24. It was in the PH transcripts. And they continue to lie.

[MizSterious]

Actually, there is another affie that has not yet been entirely unsealed that mentions porn--if I'm not mistaken. Perhaps Rheo will remember that item?

[Rheo]

Warrant 27830..regarding film and pictures of nudity and/or sexual activity involving juveniles and/or juveniles w/adults, and documents showing dominion and control.

The sealed portions are:

Attachment A, page 7, line 19 through page 8, line 13.

Attachment A, page 12, line 18, through page 13, line 10.

Attachment A, page 15, line 11 through the end of page 16.

I also thought the phone trap on the VD phone was to be unsealed but it appears they unsealed the police cell phone affidavit instead...regarding Detective Collins recreation trip on 2/16.

Be back in couple of hours.